- OT
- 100% Optical: Previous shows
- Navigating the professional conduct pitfalls of an increasingly digital world
100% Optical
Navigating the professional conduct pitfalls of an increasingly digital world
Dr Peter Hampson encouraged practitioners to think twice before turning to WhatsApp for advice during the 100% Optical presentation Virtual insanity
04 March 2026
Cautionary tales about sharing patient information and using WhatsApp for guidance were shared as part of the 100% Optical presentation Virtual insanity (28 February, Excel London).
AOP head of clinical negligence, Efa Schmidt, outlined the concepts of causation and breach of duty within clinical negligence claims.
When establishing whether a breach occurred, the optometrist’s actions are assessed against the steps that would be taken by a reasonably competent optometrist in the same set of circumstances.
She highlighted that causation involves examining whether an action or inaction caused something avoidable to happen.
“Every case is fact-specific and can take different directions,” Schmidt highlighted.
“I really do want to get across that causation is complicated and does involve multiple experts, so these claims can take some time to be resolved,” she said.
Schmidt told delegates that the AOP sees around 60 to 80 clinical negligence claims per year.
She added that in 2024–2025 the General Optical Council (GOC) triaged 464 complaints and opened 137 new investigations. These numbers represent a 21.4% increase in the optical regulator’s caseload.
“That is substantial. But I think it’s worth pointing out the context – there are 25 million sight tests that take place across the UK each year,” Schmidt shared.
She highlighted that the most common misdiagnosis category that her team supports members with is retinal detachments.
“Due to the increased number of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans that are being performed, if there is a clear retinal detachment, it can be very difficult to defend,” Schmidt said.
AOP clinical and policy director, Dr Peter Hampson, discussed the risks of using online messaging platforms, such as WhatsApp, for advice on patient management.
Hampson shared that it is important when people seek advice that the person who is providing guidance is qualified to do so and will take accountability for the advice that it is given.
“For these informal WhatsApp groups and forums, anyone can register and anyone can post in them,” he said.
“Within WhatsApp, often the messages disappear after a period of time or people delete messages,” he said.
Hampson emphasised the importance of carefully reviewing all imaging that is performed – including OCT scans.
“I know people are busy and we have so much data that is coming at us, but if something is captured – whether it is an OCT, Optomap, corneal topography or visual fields – it is really important that you stop and look at it,” he said.
Hampson highlighted to delegates the need to keep patient information confidential – discouraging practitioners from taking screenshots of patient management software if, for example, a well-known individual has an appointment.
He referred to a case where two Ipswich Hospital staff were disciplined after they accessed Ed Sheeran’s care record without a legitimate clinical reason.
“We should respect our patients’ privacy. We should make sure that all information is kept confidential and we don’t share it. I think that’s really important,” Hampson said.
In a nutshell: Efa Schmidt and Dr Peter Hampson share their key takeaways
Efa Schmidt: “In the presentation, we try to bring to life what we are seeing within the AOP so that those working in practice can take steps to prevent these cases from arising. A key message that we try to get across is that for any imaging that is taken, you have to review those images. With the popularity of imaging technology, we are increasingly seeing cases that are challenging for us to defend.”
Dr Peter Hampson: “If we go back 20 years, if we examined somebody and just made notes, there could be a difference of opinion. The practitioner might say, ‘I didn’t miss it,’ and the patient might say, ‘I think you missed it.’ Now, with imaging, that ambiguity has gone away.
“Remember that you are a professional. What we do is important and it’s regulated: people trust us, and that trust shouldn't be taken lightly.”
- Explore more topics
- On the High Street
- Professional conduct
- Imaging
- OCT
- GOS
- Communication
Comments (1)
You must be logged in to join the discussion. Log in
Anonymous04 March 2026
No wonder there is an increase in complaints and investigations by the GOC. Ever increasing pressure on sight test volumes,ghost clinics, conversion rates and sales figures. Its a total bloody disgrace . Fresh from uni and young optoms are thrown into a meat grinder of test volume and targets. Why on why is the AOP and College of Optometrists not addressing ,focussing and making headline news of this issue or does it need a whistleblower to the national media? Shaun Lintern at the Times ? Once upon a time the AOP stood up for independent optometrists but now the profession's magazine Optometry Today appears to be an advertorial for the multiples ?
ReportLike11