- OT
- Our journal: past editions
- The Practice resilience edition
- Managing frame choice for high prescriptions
At the dispensing desk
Managing frame choice for high prescriptions
Our expert dispensing optician, James Dawson, shares five practical actions you can apply in practice to manage frame choice expectations for a high prescription
05 June 2026
You know that dispense where the patient with a completely unsuitable high or awkward prescription falls in love with a frame, and all you can see is a disaster waiting to happen. The +8.00 wanting a pilot aviator, the -10.00 wanting a huge metal frame halfway down their nose. So how can we navigate these dilemmas? Here, dispensing optician James Dawson shares his five steps to having a positive conversation that manages expectations.
1 Acknowledge the emotional choice, not just the technical problem
Validate the patient’s enthusiasm. If they’ve fallen in love with a frame – that matters. It’s part of their identity and how they want to present themselves or want to fit in with others’ style. Avoid immediately shutting it down. Instead, explore what they like about it: the shape, size, colour, feel or brand. Build a rapport and show you’re not dismissing their taste. Then, gently introduce the idea that not every frame works equally well with every prescription. Make the conversation a collaboration: your role is to help them get something that looks great and performs well. This early alignment reduces defensiveness later when you explain compromises or limitations.
2 Clearly explain the lens-frame mismatch in simple terms
High prescriptions often mean thicker lenses, especially at the edges. Explain how the chosen frame, perhaps large, rimless, or with thin metal, will highlight those thickness issues. Use plain language such as: “This frame is quite wide, which means your lenses would be thicker and heavier here on the sides.” If possible, show a sample lens or a similar finished pair to make the explanation tangible. Avoid jargon, use simple to understand terms, unless the patient asks for detail. The goal is understanding, not impressing them. When patients see the issue, they’re more likely to trust your guidance rather than feel like you are just steering them away from their preference.
Patients appreciate honesty and it allows for an informed choice. It also protects you from dissatisfaction later
3 Be transparent about trade-offs, not just problems
Instead of presenting it as a yes/no decision, outline what happens if they proceed anyway. For example: increased lens thickness, more noticeable edge lines, possible weight discomfort, and cosmetic distortion. Then, balance that with what can be improved, like using higher index materials or edge polishing. This shifts the tone from “you can’t have this” to “you can, but here’s what it will realistically look and feel like.” Patients appreciate honesty and it allows for an informed choice. It also protects you from dissatisfaction later, because expectations were clearly set upfront rather than discovered after collection.
4 Offer tailored alternatives that preserve their style
Don’t just reject a frame, redirect the aesthetic. Find similar options that suit high prescriptions better, such as smaller eye sizes, thicker rims, or more supportive shapes. Link the alternatives directly to what the patient originally liked. For example, “You liked the bold square look and this one keeps that style, but will hold your lenses much better.” This keeps the conversation positive and solution focused. Ideally, present two or three curated options rather than overwhelming them. When patients feel they still have control and choice, they’re more willing to pivot. The key is making the alternative feel like an upgrade, not a compromise.
In many cases, patients will either switch frames before purchase or feel satisfied because the outcome matches what they were prepared for
5 Let the patient decide, but document and reinforce expectations
If the patient still chooses the original frame, you have to ensure you are happy to respect that decision, but reinforce the earlier discussion. Briefly recap the key points: thickness, weight, and cosmetic outcomes. Keep it calm and matter of fact, not repetitive or patronising. Where appropriate, note the discussion in your records to avoid issues later. When the glasses are dispensed, revisit expectations again so nothing feels like a surprise. This approach maintains trust: you guided them professionally without being controlling. In many cases, patients will either switch frames before purchase or feel satisfied because the outcome matches what they were prepared for.
And don't forget… If you are not happy to dispense it, say no.
About the author
James Dawson 
Dispensing optician
James Dawson is a dispensing optician and was an AOP Councillor for nine years, stepping down in 2024
- Explore more topics
- Practice team
- Dispensing
- Feature
Advertisement
More At the dispensing desk
Practice team training See all
-
Contact lens application and removal training
- Published on: 27 June 2025
-
Improving the quality of visual field tests
- Published on: 27 June 2025
-
Effective triage
- Published on: 27 June 2025
-
From complaints to compliments
- Published on: 27 June 2025
Comments (0)
You must be logged in to join the discussion. Log in