- OT
- Our journal: past editions
- The Prevention and policy edition
- “Your vision has consequences for others”
A final thought
“Your vision has consequences for others”
AOP past chairman, Professor Julie-Anne Little, on the UK vision driving standards ahead of changes expected this Autumn
03 October 2025
Driving is such a visual skill, it’s the one thing you do in life where your vision has consequences for others. In most situations, your vision and your level of vision is in some ways your own business, but when you get behind the wheel of a vehicle you have a duty of care to others.
As optometrists, we have such an important role to play in the day-to-day advice we give people around their need for spectacles and vision correction when they’re driving.
I’ve always been conscious of the challenges of the number plate test – it is not the same and does not reflect what we may understand about someone’s vision using the visual acuity chart. We also know that the Esterman visual field test for driving is not necessarily representative of the way we use our visual fields for driving.
The Department of Transport likes the idea that it’s easily translatable to the public so they can understand that this is the distance they need to read. But the challenge of course is how it’s interpreted.
Through my work in Europe and beyond, I became increasingly aware of the breadth of variation in the visual standards for driving. For example, in the EU, on the face of it there is a uniform standard, but of course the way it is implemented can be very variable. Living in Northern Ireland as well, I have from time-to-time seen patients from the Republic of Ireland, who present for an eye test which they must have before applying for their driving licence.
My main concern with the way in which vision is assessed (or not) for driving in the UK has always been that the only time a person is ever assessed is at the time of the driving test, which for many people will be when they’re 17 or 18 years of age. It has always seemed bizarre to me that on licence renewal thereafter, drivers are not assessed again. Instead, they are simply asked whether they still meet the standard, and there’s a tick box that follows saying yes, and off they go.
Conversations in practice
The majority of patients that optometrists see, with the appropriate vision correction and the appropriate intervention, will continue to meet the driving vision standards. As optometrists we are optimising their sight to enable them to drive for as long as possible. When talking about the vision driving standards generally, it’s a proactive message that we will be able to correct the majority of people’s sight to be able to facilitate them to drive. It’s important to emphasise that we are not asking people through this standard to read to the very bottom of the chart – I think this is something that people don’t always realise.
While the difficult conversation of not meeting the vision standard for driving does not happen frequently, it is nevertheless a challenging conversation to have with a patient. I think this is where continuity of care can be really helpful – if you’ve been monitoring someone’s eye disease, by the time this conversation comes, you will have articulated or flagged that this might be something coming down the track – you have sowed the seed for them thinking about the future and what comes next. These earlier conversations are important as they will help to then facilitate those later ones.
I would be careful to always document all of these kinds of conversations. If another optometrist is seeing a patient on their next visit, they are able to use your notes and mention it to the patient as something that has been talked about previously. Whether the patient has remembered it or not, this helps reinforce and prepare for the message that may come later.
I have definitely had a couple of instances where I felt that the patient is not going to adhere to my advice on and is going to continue to drive. In those situations, I’ve followed the AOP’s advice and guidance.
These conversations and situations are difficult, but you should remember that it’s for the greater importance of the patient and the public.
Campaigning for change
The AOP’s Don’t swerve a sight test has been a really important campaign to run. The longevity of the campaign is testament to our commitment to trying to improve the clarity and robustness of vision standards for driving in the UK.
Establishing the campaign, and calling for change, allowed us to talk about what we felt the standard in the UK should be and what our ask was. Over the years, our recommendations have never been radical – we’re not saying that every driver needs to come in for an eye test every two years and show evidence of that – we have always said that, on licence renewal, every driver should have an eye test, and that should really happen for over 70s, but ideally it should happen in earlier decades as well.
“The visual standard is not too high of a barrier. It’s not about having perfect vision, it’s about having good enough vision to meet the standard – and optometrists can support patients in maintaining their vision to make sure those standards can be met, and they can continue to drive safely”
With campaigns such as this, you don’t know that these things have cut-through until eventually something starts to change. So I was thrilled to hear the news in August that there are plans to introduce mandatory sight tests for drivers over the age of 70 at licence renewal within a new road safety strategy, which is expected to be released in the autumn.
Of all our asks, this is a really important one. With the ageing eye there is an increased risk of ocular disease, and a lot of these diseases are painless and asymptomatic in the early stages, so people are not necessarily the best judges of their vision and will not notice a gradual loss in vision. Having this safety net for people to be compelled to come in for an eye check at that point in time is perfectly reasonable, and we might find other ocular diseases in the course of doing that, particularly in those who were not necessarily accessing eye care. While for some older people this change may feel negative or unhelpful, I would emphasise that its introduction is about optometrists being able to support and facilitate them driving safely for as long as possible.
The visual standard is not too high of a barrier. It’s not about having perfect vision, it’s about having good enough vision to meet the standard – and optometrists can support patients in maintaining their vision to make sure those standards are met, and they can continue to drive safely.
I hope that this pending change raises the public’s awareness of the importance of vision and driving
Julie-Anne’s top reads
- Pre-reg focus: OT welcomes a new pre-reg student who shares their journey at Boots Opticians
- In focus: OT looks into the impact of menopause in the workplace, and women working in optometry share their experiences
- Special report: This instalment explores the evolution of hospital services, and the effects of the shift towards care in the community
Comments (0)
You must be logged in to join the discussion. Log in