- OT
- Professional support
- Health services
- National strategy for eye health ‘urgently needed,’ say experts
National strategy for eye health ‘urgently needed,’ say experts
Six practical recommendations for a national strategy for eye health have been shared by the Industry Vision Group
07 November 2023
A set of practical recommendations for a National Strategy for Eye Health has been published by the Industry Vision Group.
The group, made up of representatives from seven pharmaceutical and medical devices companies, has advised that a coordinated strategy should focus on prevention, data and digital technologies, and treatment and innovation.
The group is working to create a national strategy for eye health and is “committed to increasing the prioritisation of eye health among Government, NHS leaders, policymakers and commissioners at both a national and local level,” its report said.
Pharmaceuticals and the medical device industry has a strong role “in tackling avoidable and inherited causes of sight loss, and the role that existing treatments and emerging technologies can play in these efforts,” it added.
The numbers
250
People start to lose their sight every dayTwo million
People in the UK are currently living with an eye condition that could lead to sight loss7.5 million
Ophthalmology outpatient appointments take place every year in England2.7 million
People are expected to be living with sight loss by 203020,000 – 35,000
People in the UK live with an inherited retinal disease76%
The percentage of eye units currently without enough consultantsThe Royal National Institiute of Blind People (RNIB), Macular Society, Retina UK, Glaucoma UK, Fight for Sight, the Royal College of Ophthalmologists and various NHS trusts also assisted in creation of the report.
Introducing the report, Tori Griffiths, the group chair and a public affairs partner at Roche, and Paul Cox, the group’s vice chair and a general manager at Apellis, said: “a new national strategy for eye health is now urgently needed, setting out the steps that can enable the NHS to be the best place for the care and treatment of people living with these conditions.”
The report was developed alongside clinical experts and patients, “with the ultimate goal of better outcomes for people at risk of or living with sight loss,” Griffiths and Cox added.
The report noted that the economic burden of sight loss is expected to increase to £29.9 billion by 2030, and £33.5 billion a year by 2050.
Better preventative action, timely diagnosis, effective condition management and faster adoption of innovations in care and treatment are required to adequately manage the predicted increase, the report suggested, adding that adopting these solutions is a “necessity if we are to reduce the burden of avoidable sight loss on patients, the NHS and wider society.”
The report notes that ophthalmology has not been a focus of national health strategy documents such as the NHS Long Term Plan or August 2023’s Major Conditions Strategy Framework, despite being the busiest outpatient specialty in the NHS.
“There are significant opportunities to address the growing burden of eye health conditions on individuals, the health system and wider society,” the report said.
Emotional and demographic impact of sight loss
60%
Of people with sight loss are women3x
The risk of diabetic eye disease is approximately three times greater in South Asian people40%
Of people attending low vision clinics are suffering from symptoms of clinical depressionThere are challenges with data not always being joined up, the report said, meaning patients might present at an optometry or GP practice or in hospital, and lack of information sharing can hinder innovation, which “then affects the quality of decision-making for both individual treatment options and wider commissioning strategies.”
The ophthalmology workforce was also identified as an issue that needs attention.
There is a need for a government strategy to improve ophthalmology research, because there are “wider pressures on ophthalmology services which mean that many clinicians in other areas simply don’t have the capacity to meaningfully engage in research activity,” the report said.
There is an “urgent need for increased training among the ophthalmology workforce to treat retinal conditions and broaden the role to encompass new conditions and improve access to meet growing demand on services,” the report continued.
The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan needs to consider ophthalmology, it added, noting that “specific consideration is needed around how implementation of workforce plans will seek to address eye health inequalities.”
The Industry Vision Group hopes the report’s recommendations will highlight opportunities that exist, help to inform a national eye care strategy, and have wide applications across the UK.
What a national eye health strategy could accomplish
A national eye health strategy would offer an opportunity to highlight “emerging best practice taking place across the country – including how different ways of working can support in enhancing patient choice, reducing demand of primary and secondary care services, and improve data collection,” the report said.It would also “provide a platform for action” in response to challenges in ophthalmology, it emphasised, adding that “a long-term, strategic approach to NHS eye care delivery is therefore vital to ensure NHS preparedness for future demand, within which novel treatment and technologies are likely to play a crucial role.”
The financial cost of sight loss
£25.2 billion
How much poor eye health costs the UK economy per year£7.4 billion
How much exclusion from the workplace costs the UK every year30–40%
How much the demand on eye services is expected to increase in the next 20 yearsThe report also noted that a national strategy would allow for consistency in approach whichever political party is in government, highlighting that a 20-year improvement in cancer survival was seen in Denmark after a cross-party approach was agreed upon.
“Any national strategy for eye care would likely set out clear and helpful targets for improving outcomes, [and] recommendations around the uptake of best practice and would ultimately provide a powerful vision for how stakeholders can best work together to transcend traditional care boundaries and the short-term recurrent crises facing the health service,” the report said.
It continued: “This would be particularly beneficial in the context of the recent transition to Integrated Care Systems (ICSs), by providing systems with a clear framework for local action to improve eye care service delivery and helping to eliminate unwarranted variation.”
Phil Ambler, England country director at the Royal National Institute of Blind People, was quoted in the report.
“There is a clear need for a national eye health plan to address avoidable sight loss coherently, across all ages and sections of society, and to address the existing inequalities,” Ambler said.
Joanne Creighton, chief executive of Glaucoma UK, added that “to genuinely tackle avoidable sight loss, a national eye health strategy must address the challenge of underserved audiences wherein the greatest risk of sight loss often lies.”
She added: “Innovation focused on community-based mobile screening has particular potential for glaucoma, for example, but we need to know much more about the health seeking attitudes and behaviours of our target audiences in order to make a meaningful difference to equality and access.”
Primary care optometry
The report notes that optometrists play an integral role as first-contact NHS care providers for the assessment and management of minor eye conditions and eye disease, as well the management of some post-operative care, and that “there is therefore an opportunity to intervene at the earliest stage with advice, support and signposting to services.”If optometrists are fully utilised the burden on secondary care can be reduced, the report suggested, adding that the Industry Vision Group supports independent prescribing for optometrists, alongside greater access to clinical placements in hospitals.
“Demand for eye care services is at an all-time high and is set to increase in the years ahead, so we need to look at how these services are provided to address this,” Ambler said. “Delays to treatment for certain eye conditions can have life changing and irreversible consequences. Wet age-related macular degeneration is one such condition, where patients can experience rapid and sometimes complete central vision loss within a few weeks if left untreated.”
Six recommendations
The overarching recommendations offered by the report are themed around prevention, data and digital technologies, and treatment and innovation.
1 Prevention strategies set by the Government should include a specific testing programme for eye health conditions
Targeted testing for eye conditions would be particularly useful among at-risk groups, the report said. Men and ethnic groups are the most likely to skip an eye test, so a prevention policy should focus on the value of sight tests too.
“Promoting and supporting greater uptake of routine eye tests – particularly for at-risk groups such as those with diabetes, history of eye disease and in the advanced age population – offers the opportunity to increase early detection of eye disease, support timely referral to treatment and improve both outcomes and experience for patients,” the report said.
2 National data registries for eye health conditions
These should be set up across the UK in order “to better understand service performance, patient outcomes and clinical risk across the system,” the report advised.
Improved recording of data should be a requirement of ICSs, and cover all sight-threatening conditions as well as mental health conditions and treatment, it continued, adding that “development of national level registries should enable improvements in the quality, depth and accuracy of data collected at a national level.”
3 Electronic records and referral systems in ophthalmology should be better integrated into community and primary care
The report emphasised that IT connectivity is needed because patients often present to different parts of the system.
“Electronic record and referral systems will encourage seamless and efficient transfer of information and diagnostic imaging between providers, ensuring information travels with the patient throughout their journey, as well as reducing bureaucracy involved in repeat information or tests, thereby ultimately reducing delays to diagnosis,” the report said.
4 Consultation with patients and patient groups is needed
Further consultation with patients and their representative groups is needed in order to “better understand health status and quality of life of people with eye health conditions and sight loss,” the report said, noting that health services should be designed around the individual.
It added that ICSs in England should be “encouraged to engage with the populations that they serve to ensure measurement of the outcomes that matter most to patients.”
5 A strategy should feature training on innovative treatments and technologies
Advanced therapies, emerging cell and gene therapies, medical devices and diagnostic technologies including AI will “shape the future ophthalmology environment and provide the UK with the opportunity to become a world-leader in advancing standards of care,” the Industry Vision Group believes.
6 A focus on rare eye diseases
NHS and national health technology appraisal agencies should develop guidance for the management and treatment of rare eye diseases, “including clear care pathways, access to genetic counselling and testing, criteria for referral to specialist care and treatment, and data collection requirements,” the report said. “To support this, NHS organisations should consider development of a rare eye disease database.”
The AOP’s Sight Won’t Wait campaign is calling on the Government to urgently address eye care waiting lists in the UK. Add your voice and tell your MP it’s time to end the eye care crisis here.
Most popular
Advertisement
Comments (1)
You must be logged in to join the discussion. Log in
Nicholas Rumney4 weeks ago
Interesting that the College of Optometrists AOP and FODO are NOT listed as contributors ? I find the list somewhat top down rather than bottom up and it's not the way Tesco or Aldi go about reducing in store bottlenecks, nor McLaren their pit stops. I can find fault with each of the 6 priorities.
1. Screening for diseases of low prevalence (like glaucoma) are fraught with epidemiological false positive. Diabetic retinopathy screening HAS worked but is now being scaled back to 24/12 for good reason. I would contend HES Ophthalmology does not need to go looking for more disease that it can't assess or treat ? Surely we learned about false positives in Covid 19 PCR testing ? a small percentage of a very large number leaves a large number of FP's
2. The BD8 was a national level registry ? What do they mean by a nation ? Do they mean us (England) or all devolved administrations. England's problem is the parochial ICB system.
3. Yes. Good one. Have we not been asking for that for eons. We have Nhs.net email but locally ERs has been dumped or is not adopted, nor OPERA because they are clunky and NOT NATIONAL. Our HES is still mired in A4 paper notes files. A national NHS IT project ? Surely not.
4. Fine words butter no parsnips. A motherhood and apple pie statement. Good idea idea but not if the partnership excludes those delivering front end services.
5. One is tempted to say "you can't manage the conditions you can treat" is it ill behoves a Pharma led coalition driving for more expensive drugs and treatments NICE won't accept ? Just sort front end glaucoma referral and cataract first then do the hard stuff.
6. A rare eye disease database; sure let old people go blind and lose their independence in untreated glaucoma or unoperated cataract ?
Marks out of 10 ? 3 on a good day. Should be dismissed out of hand not praised
Report Like 14