13 November 2023
The Local Optical Committee Support Unit (LOCSU) has been asked to create a standard service specification for minor and urgent eye care, the organisation’s clinical director, Zoe Richmond, confirmed today (13 November).
Richmond shared the news on the first morning of LOCSU’s National Optical Conference, which is being held in Wyboston, Bedfordshire.
The objective of a standard specification for minor and urgent eye care would “improve consistency and reduce the unwarranted variation that we currently have across England,” Richmond said.
LOCSU has been asked to create the specification alongside the Clinical Council for Eye Health Commissioning (CCEHC).
The request came from then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Primary Care and Public Health, Neil O’Brien.
O’Brien stepped down from his role during Rishi Sunak’s reshuffle.
The reshuffle also saw Health Secretary Steve Barclay replaced with Victoria Atkins.
AOP response: “Bold thinking is needed”
The AOP has emphasised that, while a standard specification for within Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) is welcome, ambition for a national plan should remain key.
The association has called for ‘bold thinking’ in response to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC’s) request.
Ambition for a national approach ‘should not be sacrificed,’ the AOP said.
Adam Sampson, AOP chief executive, said: “This request is strongly welcomed by the AOP. Our policy and influencing work – including the successful Sight Won’t Wait campaign – has consistently called on the Government to recognise that extended eye care services delivered by primary care optometry, including minor and urgent eye care, relieves pressure on hospital eye services, A&E, and GP appointments. The approach to the profession for the development of this pathway is a response to that pressure.”
Sampson added: “We have reached a significant moment for optometry. The DHSC is right to acknowledge the role the profession plays, providing valued eye care across the country. And the intention to make more effective use of our highly trained clinical workforce, coupled with a commitment to the delivery of eye care services that are fit for the future and able to reach more patients earlier, is overdue.
“LOCSU and CCHEC have the important task of designing the standard service specification for minor and urgent eye care, on behalf of the whole sector, and the AOP is committed to assist wherever we can.”
The development of the specification must be done “at pace and with pragmatism,” Sampson said, “but this should not mean that ambition should be sacrificed. Bold thinking is needed to ensure that the scope of the services offered, and the associated pricing structure, are sustainable for optometry, while also meeting the needs of an ageing population.”
He added: “Crucially, the standard service specification for minor and urgent eye care should be available everywhere and accessible to all. While some ICB areas have commissioned existing Minor Eye Conditions Services and CUES, it is evident that commissioning is highly variable across the country.
“That is why we continue to advocate for a national approach that brings the postcode lottery of eye care to an end. A locally commissioned model that lacks additional funding and has no guidance from DHSC to prioritise the new service is going to fall short for patients and limit the impact optometry can make. It would also fail to live up to the ministerial expectations that this new initiative will have a significant impact on the nation’s eye care.”
Comments (2)
You must be logged in to join the discussion. Log in
Nicholas Rumney3 weeks ago
Some suggested rules.
Please stop using the term MINOR. A patient does not know if keratitis created eye pain is induced induced from blepharitis or MK. Stick to URGENT, CUES remains slick COMMUNITY URGENT EYECARE SCHEME.
Do NOT stop at the aspiration of accessing a small formulary under PGD's but make sure the contract is FULLY available to IP optometrists with IMMEDIATE and FULL access to FP10 pads on ALL commissioned schemes.
DO NOT LET the ICB medicines management panels restrict IP optometrists to "medicines only normally used (in their limited definition of) primary care; GP's" as this is far too limiting and removes steroids, ocular hypotensive, mucolytics, etc. Treat IP Optometrists as autonomous specialists in their own right.
Make ONE rule for all. Those of us who do not use CHEC or other 3rd party referral routes like "Evolutio"want our patients to have the same access to examination, investigation, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up and do nit want our homework marked by a 3rd party.
As a radical rule; restrict basic (M)ECS contract to non-IP optometrists for a maximum of 3 years after which they MUST have risen to IP or lose the contract.
If a National system is at a lower level of scope than exists in many areas (certainly our area) and is adopted by ICB's those of us with full scope IP CUES will walk and send everyone to A&E.
Report Like 15
Christopher3 weeks ago
The lack of joined up thinking isn't just a problem from a patient-care point of view, it's also a major issue with advertising and encouraging referring into and use of the service. One of the most common "oh dear" moments is when a patient says these words: "I rang 111". The seem clueless at the best of times and with local services they seem to have absolutely no knowledge of their existence. A national protocol would make this easier, but I imaging 111 get plenty of other things wrong - they surely should have a computer system that can alert them to the appropriate service based on the patient's area - it certainly appears at the moment they are using very generic information.
Report Like 14